Nehjul Balagah Detailed Explanation Nehjul Balagah Detailed Explanation : 135

Detailed Explanation — Sermon (135): On Talhah and Zubayr, Retribution for Uthman's Blood, and His Allegiance

In Sermon (135), Imam Ali (peace be upon him) addresses Talhah and Zubayr during a critical juncture in Islamic history. This sermon was delivered after the assassination of Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him), when divisions within the Muslim community were deepening. Talhah and Zubayr, who had previously supported Imam Ali (a.s.), had now turned against him. The Imam used this sermon to respond to their accusations and highlight their injustices.

Imam Ali (a.s.) asserts that Talhah and Zubayr have not made any genuine accusations against him, nor have they acted justly between themselves and him. They demand rights that they themselves have abandoned and seek retribution for blood they have shed. This statement underscores the hypocrisy of their demands and emphasizes the importance of accountability in one's actions.

The Imam further argues that if he were a partner in wrongdoing, then they too would share in the consequences. Conversely, if they were the wrongdoers, the demand for justice should fall solely upon them. This reflects a profound moral lesson about self-reflection and the need to take responsibility for one’s actions before placing blame on others.

He also mentions that he will create a pool for them from which they will not be able to return quenched, symbolizing the dire consequences awaiting those who stray from the truth. This serves as a spiritual reminder that those who deviate from righteousness will face severe repercussions in the hereafter.

Additionally, Imam Ali (a.s.) describes the eagerness with which people approached him for allegiance, likening it to unmilked camels rushing towards their young. This metaphor highlights the opportunistic nature of some individuals who may seek to benefit from leadership without genuine commitment. The Imam's reflection on how he tried to withdraw his hands, but they pulled him back, illustrates the complexities of leadership and loyalty.

He concludes by expressing his frustration that he had repeatedly tried to dissuade Talhah and Zubayr from conflict before it erupted, but they failed to appreciate the opportunity for peace. This serves as a crucial reminder to value and seize opportunities for harmony in our lives, rather than allowing disputes to escalate into conflict.